| Help |
Joel has been in the business of creating and enabling engaging online learning solutions since 1994. 

The Generalist Blog is, as the name suggests, a wide ranging discussion of all things eLearning including the best online learning platform, KMi's eLMS, implementing elearning, training content developement and more. 

If you'd like to contact Joel directly, write him at jvcopeland@kmionline.com





 
There are 0 comments
Tags:
bio
 

Every now and again we get a break from custom elearning content development to do some marketing work. Most of the time there's a strong learning component especially in explaining complex processes. Other times it's just meant to leave a general impression. Check out this site for which KMi produced the video. We shot the execs on a green screen in New York. It was another chance to work with our favorite cameraman Ed with Ventana Productions.
 
There are 0 comments
We recently moved our blogs to our own software application. That's right, you're looking at the blog tool that's integrated into KMi's best learning management system, eLMS. Blogs are only one of the recent and near future enhancements that we're implementing. We've added or are adding LinkedIn-like profile pages, a course based comment/discussion tool and much more. eLMS is really becoming the ideal hosted learning management system for associations, professional groups, and any organization that wants to support communities of learners.

Next up... mobile eLearning or mLearning. More on that soon.

In the meantime click here if you'd like a 30 day free trial of eLMS or you can always contact me at jvcopeland@kmionline.com.

We'd like to thank Compendium Blogware for their support over the first year of our blogging efforts. If you are interested in blogging for SEO, we highly recommend their tool and their outstanding customer service.
 
There are 0 comments
OK. So, I'm one of the owners of an online learning company, I've been involved in web based elearning forever and KMi does sell the best learning management system out there. So, how did I miss this...
The meta-analysis found that, on average, students in online learning conditions performed better than those receiving face-to-face instruction"
What? "Performed better?" Online better than face-to-face? Whose is this so called meta-analysis?  Did some eLearning company commission another cheesy whitepaper?

Well, it turns out that this study of studies (that's what a meta-analysis is) was done by (watch out, I'm going to start yelling here) THE US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION. That's right the DOE. 

You can read it here.

The DOE looked at 51 studies conducted over 12 years and came to that stunning conclusion. 

What happened to the conventional wisdom that holds that instructor led training is always best? Why do our arguments for elearning continue to revolve around various limp attempts at proving ROI instead of the simple assertion that elearning works better?  Maybe we do need some serious "unlearning".

It's full disclosure time. I haven't read it. I scanned the abstract. But I'm gonna do it now and I'll be back to check in if I find anything else interesting. In the meantime I can always be reached at jvcopeland@kmionline.com if you'd like to know how KMi can help you implement elearning in your organization.
 
There are 0 comments
Much of the custom content development work that we do at KMi involves voice over narration. While we do a fair amount of the writing, we also work frequently with outside subject matter experts to develop the scripts needed for customized eLearning. We developed the material below to help guide writers who may not be all that familiar with writing the spoken word.

In web based elearning as in any media production the primary objective in preparing a script for a narrator is enabling as smooth a read as possible. Every mistake on a script or every place where something is unclear will almost certainly result in a bobble by the narrator. Every bobble by the narrator extends the amount of time and increases the dollar amount that they and the audio studio will charge. At a minimum of $300 per hour you can understand why we want to make the process as efficient as possible.  To that end we’re providing a few suggestions for you to keep in mind as you prepare the script.

 

  •  Read it aloud to yourself. This is the best way of catching mistakes before they get to the narrator. An error we see frequently is the use of extra or missing words. Spell-check doesn’t pick them up and they’re hard to see when you are proofing silently.
     
  •  Don’t use slashes: Replace them with the word you want used so the narrator does not have to stop and decide whether it should be “and”, “or”, “and-or” , “slash” or “stroke”.
     
  • Provide phonetic pronunciation for foreign words. We recently received a script with 7 Japanese words that were repeated frequently. Luckily the engineer was familiar with Japanese pronunciation and we were able to muddle through. Even so that omission probably cost 20-30 minutes of narrator and studio time.
     
  • Tell the narrator how acronyms are to be pronounced. For example, do you want SKU pronounced “S-K-U’ or “skew”?
     
  • Same for letter number combinations. Is BA62 to be pronounced “B-A-six-two” or “B-A-sixty-two”?
     
  •  Limit parenthetical comments. Recognize that a narrator has to use intonation to signal to the learner that “we’re taking a short side trip here”.  Keep them short and use very few. Parenthetical comments that are too long and too frequent can make a sentence very hard to read sensibly. If you feel that you need more than one in a sentence chances are you need a new sentence.
     
  • Use bulleted copy rather than long sentences with semi-colons. Here’s a recent example:

 

“These improvements can include reduction in material costs from the use of alternate materials or reduction in scrap; reduction in labor and service costs by locating service personnel in lower cost labor markets and increasing the use of labor saving technology, such as automated voice response systems; improvements in quality through programs such as Lean Six Sigma; reduction in inventory through improved forecasting and sharing of demand data throughout the supply chain; and reduction in life cycle and maintenance costs from preventive maintenance programs.”

 

This is a perfectly fine sentence but the narrator would have a much easier time of it if it were formatted like this:

 

These improvements can include reduction in material costs from the use of:

  • alternate materials or reduction in scrap
  • reduction in labor and service costs by locating service personnel in lower cost labor markets and increasing the use of labor saving technology, such as automated voice response systems  
  • improvements in quality through programs such as Lean Six Sigma
  • reduction in inventory through improved forecasting and sharing of demand data throughout the supply chain
  • and reduction in life cycle and maintenance costs from preventive maintenance programs.
     
I hope you find this useful. If you'd like other useful information on eLearning content, click here to download a free white paper on the appropriate use of different formats.
 
There are 0 comments
...but I don't think you'd want to. Unless you're a nurse that is. 

The KMi learning content development team is just wrapping up production for an online training solution to teach nurses (gulp, wait for it)... how to catheterize a patient. Now, you probably have gathered that we're big on customized elearning here at KMi but I bet you think that there's a limit to what kind of training eLearning is good for. I'll also bet you'd rather not be catheterized (If, God forbid, you needed to be) by a nurse who learned via web-based eLearning. Right? 

I'm with you there, so here's the good news...we're not actually teaching them how to insert a catheter, but instead how to use a catheter kit. (phew!)

web based elearningYou see, the kit is put together in such a way, that if the elements are used in the right order, and in the right way, a sterile field is maintained and the likelihood of infection in patients is greatly reduced.  

That's what we call "perform procedure" and online learning solutions are absolutely great at that kind of training.

The fourth module in the four-module series is a simulation where the learner controls the hands of the nurse as he/she goes through the process step by step. It's very cool but kind of graphic. If you think you can handle seeing it, write me at jvcopeland@kmionline.com and we'll set up a demo for you.
 
There are 0 comments

I'm going to interrupt the Partner/Vendor series a bit here to write about another subject.

 

KMi has done a lot of work in developing online compliance and ethics courses. In fact, the production of a series of web-based business ethics case studies is where I got my start as an online training provider way back in the early 90's. It would not be inaccurate to say that to say that KMi owes its existence as one of the best eLearning development companies precisely because of those early case studies. But that's another subject for another day.

 

We are preparing to launch a marketing push with our partner, Integrity Works Inc. in connection with the release of the 2009 Ethics Resource Center National Business Ethics Survey. (NBES) In getting ready for our efforts we've been researching earlier surveys. Here's a quote from the 2007 NBES:

 

This year, more than half of the employees surveyed are reporting misconduct (56%). The three most common types of misconduct reported include conflicts of interest (23%), abusive or intimidating behavior (21%), and lying to employees (20%). The statistics are more troubling in “negative” work  environments. ERC describes a negative work environment as one where employees feel:

  • A lack of satisfaction with information from top management and/or supervisors
  • A lack of trust that top management, supervisors, and/or coworkers will keep promises or commitments
  • The company rewards employees who are successful, even if it is through questionable means

The number of strong ethical cultures, ones where the above characteristics are absent, is on the decline. Only 10 percent of U.S. companies have strong ethical cultures. ERC attributes this to low management awareness of misconduct and few successful ethics and compliance programs.

 

I'm willing to bet that this grim outlook will be even worse when the 2009 NBES comes out in late October. We've seen it coming for years.The problem is not economic hard times, although the recession does exacerbate things. The problem is that US companies have relied too much on compliance and too little on ethics; too much on CYA and too little on changing culture; too much "check-the-box" and too little on changing behaviors.

 

Our role in helping a company develop a "strong ethical culture" is admittedly only one part of a larger effort. That said, really well done, really engaging custom elearning solutions on ethics, as opposed to generic library stuff, can go a long way in creating such a culture. Taking the time to make content relevant to employees, speaking their language, understanding their day-to-day dilemmas communicates management's seriousness of purpose in a uniquely powerful way.

 

If you'd like to join in on this conversation post a comment below or contact me directly at jvcopeland@kmionline.com

 
There are 0 comments
There a small debate going on within KMi on how best to produce online application training modules. One camp advocates the use of a tool like Captivate that automates the production of SCORM content  through screen recording. The other camp wants to use "pure" Flash in computer application development because of the greater level of control and flexibility that Flash provides. I'm trying to stay above the fray but I think I'm coming down on the side of the pure Flash camp. 

Don't get me wrong, I think Captivate is great as far as elearning development tools go. It has an incredible feature set and it's "publish once to multiple formats" option has the promise to be pretty useful. The problem with all the features is that they limit flexibility. Sure you can publish your tutorial as a SCORM course and a PDF at the same time, and sure it provides nifty tools that allow you to add step-by-step direction bubbles but what if you don't like the output? What if the PDF isn't laid out the way you want it? What if you want to add dimension and shading to the bubble? How easy is it to get in there to make changes? 

And therein lies the rub. Our people want to have a blank canvas to work with and they want to be able to do with it anything they want. Tools like Captivate promise to do so much for you but in return you have to give up  too much control.

More on this later.
 
There are 0 comments
12
   

©2002-2012 KMi All Rights Reserved