By
Margie Herron
on
Monday, August 30, 2010 12:02 PM
View other posts by Margie Herron
So you have a custom eLearning project ready for kick-off. After careful evaluation of eLearning development companies, you have identified the best eLearning content developer and you are eager to start the development process. The problem is you don't know exactly where to find the content for this particular custom eLearning solution. Is it in the classroom materials you previously used for this course? Or does it reside within the mind of one of your colleagues? Will you provide a high level and/or a detailed course outline and script? Frequently, clients have just such a challenge: where and in what form will the raw content be provided to the eLearning company? Identifying those sources is essential to accurately scope any custom eLearning solution. As we discussed in previous blogs, the instructional design and related storyboarding effort is dependent on the raw content. And, the effort required is in turn dependent on the source of that content. Raw content can be provided in many ways and may or may not require the active participation of the selected vendor:
1. Written: this may be in many forms, electronic files or hard copy only and from a variety of sources, such as: - Courseware from a classroom course
- PPT presentations
- Marketing materials
- Technical product, system or application tutorials
- Design document and outline
2. Oral:
- Interviews and collaboration with internal subject matter experts
- Interviews with external subject matter experts
3.Research
4.Topic specific training or product use
5. Combination of resources Whatever, the source for your raw content, it should be openly discussed at the scoping phase. This will enable your custom content development company to more effectively scope the project for time and cost as well as to identify the best internal resources for the project. The more detailed and specific the raw content, the simpler the instructional design and storyboarding effort.
For example, we created a highly successful course for an application training course. Since this content was for a new product for which no technical documentation had yet been written, the course raw content was provided as actual training of the instructional designer in the use of the application, an entirely hands -on process. Since no written content was provided, the instructional design and storyboarding effort required was a high level.
So, an experienced custom eLearning development company will work with you and the content you provide, no matter where that content may be found. But, it is critical that the client and the vendor understand what the source of that content is so that both can adequately assess the effort required to translate that into outstanding custom eLearning courseware.
KMi has 10 years of custom content development experience. Let us put that experience in action for you. Contact Margie Herron at mherron@kmionline.com for more information.
By
Margie Herron
on
Monday, August 23, 2010 10:48 AM
View other posts by Margie Herron
After many years in custom content development for eLearning, I am convinced that there are as many successful ( and unsuccessful) approaches to instructional design as there are IDs! However, the one common thread between successful courseware is to consider the end user as a human being with many distractions, low motivation for training, a frenetic daily schedule, and the need to be engaged, all while juggling emails, meetings, reports, and other daily tasks. The objective of good ID is to connect with users to give them a short, concise, encompassing, and targeted learning experience that has clear learning points, outcomes, and professional impact.
How this is accomplished depends on the ID and their understanding of the learner. KMi believes in a multi-disciplinary approach to eLearning, combining three distinct backgrounds critical in a successful project team: business savvy to fully comprehend learning content and the need for the bottom-line impact of training, instructional expertise to understand the fundamentals and nuances of the learning process, and web design mastery to exploit the full advantages of the power of web-delivery. Accordingly, the backgrounds of an instructional design team can be varied: graduate degrees in education and instructional design, marketing, advertising, professional coaching, skills assessment, organizational psychology, and classroom training. This diverse perspective can lead to innovative and compelling custom content development.
KMi has six questions that instructional designers ask themselves upon embarking on any given course. - What is the user’s motivation for taking this course?
- Will the user see something within the first 30 seconds that will entice, excite, and draw in him or her?
- Would I want to take this course amid a hectic daily business schedule?
- If a colleague asked the user about the course upon completion, what highlights would the user convey to the colleague?
- Are the key learning points prominent and effectively presented to ensure that the learner identifies, comprehends, and retains them?
- Will the course have an actual impact for the user at his or her job? (Is the connection between the training and the real-world job clear and compelling?)
It is only after thoroughly understanding the answers to these questions that we decide the approach that is best for our custom eLearning solution. We employ a number of principles and methodologies as the basis for instructional design. While these theories are not exclusively used to define rigid parameters, they do provide a system of basic recommendation in the creation of any eLearning content development. We may employ one of or a combination of these (and other) ID approaches throughout the customized eLearning project. - ADDIE
- Formative Summative Model
- Cognitive Load Theory
- Morrison, Ross and Kemp Model
If you would like to learn more about the KMi instructional design approaches, our learning content development process, or our online learning platform, eLMS, please contact Margie Herron at mherron@kmionline.com. Be sure to check out our website at www.kmionline.com
By
Margie Herron
on
Friday, June 11, 2010 3:33 PM
View other posts by Margie Herron
After attending a general B2B Expo this week, I have renewed faith that our efforts with our custom content web-based eLearning truly serve our audiences! Many people stopped by to speak with me about the impact of eLearning on their careers and professional development. Nearly everyone spoke about the high impact of online training solutions to their own personal growth. These people came from many different industries: hospitality, technology, consulting, finance, healthcare. And, they had a variety of roles, from human resources chief learning officers to customer support to sales to management. But all spoke about the many ways that implementing eLearning and SCORM learning management systems within their respective organizations aided in their ongoing education efforts. Most of the audience had experienced more traditional learning experiences throughout their careers but all indicated that the ability to learn, just when you want/need to has added exponentially to their growth. Not only do online education platforms and curricula provide easily accessible training but they allow the user to learn at their own pace, go back if necessary and use the courseware as an ongoing resource. All benefits that classroom training cannot provide. Of course, this is anecdotal evidence but isn't that exactly what we want to hear from our audiences? Let's all listen to our learner audiences. We, at KMi, believe in our custom content development services ( and so do our clients!)and the LMS platform, eLMS, that can manage and deliver all of your learning events. Let us help you give your audiences what they appreciate and so clearly want. Contact Margie Herron at mherron@kmionline.com for more information and visit our website at www.kmionline.com
By
Margie Herron
on
Friday, May 28, 2010 11:49 AM
View other posts by Margie Herron
For the past several weeks, I have been discussing the debate over the value of eLearning versus traditional classroom training. It got me to thinking that maybe we need to go back and look at all those basic reasons why implementing eLearning can be a huge benefit to your organization. And, I won't even get into the added benefits of using a hosted eLearning management system which, in and of itself, will provide numerous opportunities for reporting, follow-up, gap analysis, learning path development, evaluations and surveys. The list of benefits below are readily accepted by nearly everyone in the training industry: - eLearning is usually less expensive to produce: of course, this may be dependent on the production value and tools you use and the particular content, but, once developed, an eLearning course can be leveraged for years without additional costs.
- The user determines the pace: As a self-paced learner from way back, this is one of its most attractive benefits for me. I can move through any online training solution at my own pace and access it just when I need it. Cool!
- The learner can move through the learning faster -- As a user, I can bypass information I already know and focus on the information that I need to know. Beats sitting in a classroom and listening to repetitive material every time!
- eLearning provides a consistent message : Many of our clients are global organizations. They need their messaging to be the same whether it is delivered in Singapore, Paris or San Francisco. And, they need it to reflect just that global diversity as well. We just produced an online customer service course. One of the key learning objectives was to establish a consistent and repeatable process for customer support across their global platform. Providing the training as web based eLearning was exactly the right format for this project.
- Implementing eLearning can provide training from any location, any time, and just in time: One of the most obvious applications of this benefit was a sales training series we did for a health system hardware provider. They recognized that their sales people had little advance time to prepare for sales calls because they had such a broad range of services and products. So we created a custom series that reps could access just prior to their sales meetings to educate and update them on products and services. It was a resounding success.
- eLearning can be updated easily and quickly: I recall developing a series of product training courses, which were updated monthly. The course were template based and allowed for easy updating of product spec changes. This meant that the field always had the most current product information. Imagine doing that through classroom training!
- eLearning leads to increased retention and a stronger grasp on the subject: This is because of the many elements that can be combined in custom eLearning to reinforce the message, such as video, audio, quizzes, interaction, animations, virtual role plays, scenario-based decision-making. Users can also revisit material as they need. Online soft skills training is usually a content area that seems challenging, however, we have produced many highly effective manager skills training courses such as Coaching in this format. Taking advantage of the tools available can produce outstanding learning!
- eLearning can be managed and delivered for large or small groups of students: Using a SCORM Learning Management System such as KMi's, eLMS, allows the administrators to market courses, provide pre-assessments, evaluations, surveys, reporting, success tracking, blogs and all kinds of other features to enhance the learning experience.
Tags:
custom content development
,
customer service skill training
,
customized elearning
,
hosted learning management system
,
implementing elearning
,
learning content development
,
learning lms
,
lms management
,
online application training
,
online customer service courses
,
online education platform
,
online learning management system
,
online learning platform
,
online learning solutions
,
online soft skills training
,
online training provider
,
online training solutions
,
online training system
,
scorm
,
scorm content
,
scorm learning management system
,
scorm lms
,
training content development
,
web based elearning
By
Margie Herron
on
Friday, May 21, 2010 11:49 AM
View other posts by Margie Herron
Well, once again this week, I have been reading eLearning discussion boards and on several the topic is whether eLearning is "good", "successful", "better or worse than classroom"? How long will we continue to have these discussions? Yes, I work for a custom eLearning content developer who also has one of the best learning management systems around. But long before I became involved in the industry of online education platforms and web based training, I was a learner. Still am. And, I am frankly tired of the endless comparisons to classroom training and questions of the value of eLearning. Look, it is here stay and it is a valuable weapon in the training arsenal. I sought out eLearning before I was involved in the industry. Don't you? Listen, I have been in sales and related roles longer than I care to acknowledge. I have participated in a number of classroom trainings for sales techniques, processes, behaviors. Some of them were good and some were abysmal. And, I have taken (and created) sales training courseware. Not only have they have provided an opportunity to expand my knowledge but they have been extremely effective in communicating that knowledge...exactly when I needed and wanted it!And, I have even taken computer application training in a classroom. And, that, I can tell you flat out, can not compare to the value of taking such training just when I need it as eLearning. And, how about product training? Sure, you can spend, literally millions in some cases, to roll-out product training to your sales teams in classroom settings. As Dr. Phil would say," how's that working for you?" Millions spent, time out of the office for your most important revenue generators, and they will still need support materials to enhance that training. With rapidly changing products and services, the best way to keep your global sales teams educated, is to provide that training online, where they can access it when they need it through a learning management system. So why do we keep trying to justify eLearning? I really don't know the answer to that. It's value is just so obvious. Implementing eLearning should be a basic training methodology for any organization. Let us at KMi assist you with your online training solutions. Contact Margie Herron mherron@kmionline.com.
By
Joel Copeland
on
Wednesday, May 19, 2010 11:49 AM
View other posts by Joel Copeland
OK. So, I'm one of the owners of an online learning company, I've been involved in web based elearning forever and KMi does sell the best learning management system out there. So, how did I miss this... The meta-analysis found that, on average, students in online learning conditions performed better than those receiving face-to-face instruction"
What? "Performed better?" Online better than face-to-face? Whose is this so called meta-analysis? Did some eLearning company commission another cheesy whitepaper? Well, it turns out that this study of studies (that's what a meta-analysis is) was done by (watch out, I'm going to start yelling here) THE US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION. That's right the DOE. You can read it here. The DOE looked at 51 studies conducted over 12 years and came to that stunning conclusion. What happened to the conventional wisdom that holds that instructor led training is always best? Why do our arguments for elearning continue to revolve around various limp attempts at proving ROI instead of the simple assertion that elearning works better? Maybe we do need some serious " unlearning". It's full disclosure time. I haven't read it. I scanned the abstract. But I'm gonna do it now and I'll be back to check in if I find anything else interesting. In the meantime I can always be reached at jvcopeland@kmionline.com if you'd like to know how KMi can help you implement elearning in your organization.
By
Margie Herron
on
Friday, May 07, 2010 11:49 AM
View other posts by Margie Herron
We have spoken often in the past about how to up the production value and, therefore, the education "stickiness" of online training content. Whether it is basic skills or computer application training or, something more conceptual, such as sales behavior and communication skills training, all online training solutions benefit from added interactivities and exercises which force the user to actually participate in the web based eLearning. In an effort to better enable our clients with the tool set to add these value-laden interactive Flash assets easily into their own custom content instructional design, we have created interactive asset libraries. Depending on the client these libraries may include only custom exercises and interactivities designed specifically for them . Or for other clients they may contain assets that we developed over the years of our experience and , then, can be customized for the particular client's content. Or the library might contain a combination of assets: custom and pre-existing. This library approach allows the assets to be selected based on the content, audience, and level of interactivity desired. It makes it simple for the client, cost and time effective for both the client and custom content developer. So if you are interested in creating and implementing eLearning, this is just another way of getting greater bang for the proverbial buck. For some great examples of games, exercises, and interactivities that could form the foundation of your own interactive asset library, see http://www.kmionline.com/services and click on the production level tab and then select "learning exercises"or contact Margie Herron at mherron@kmionline.comfor more information.
By
Brian Hoffsis
on
Tuesday, April 13, 2010 5:01 AM
View other posts by Brian Hoffsis
While preparing graphics for an upcoming customized eLearning course, I realized that I was making some decisions that might be helpful for my readers to learn about. Today's post will be a "why did you do that?" lesson. The objective of the web based eLearning course is to teach picking procedures to new warehouse employees. The new employees will have a number of tools that they are required to use in order to perform the proper procedures. One very important device is the wrist-mounted radio frequency finger scanner. It's a pretty cool tool that allows the employee's hands to be free while keeping the scanner immediately available. It's a pretty complex device though and illustrating it could be quite a challenge. However, the employees taking this course will already be trained in the use of the device. In fact, for the purposes of this course, they will only need to read and interact with the device display. That makes my job slightly easier. Rather than rendering a detailed model that can be viewed from any angle, I was able to save valuable time by creating a single vector illustration of just one angle as seen below. The employee will immediately recognize the device and, therefore, focus all of their attention on interacting with the display.  The next collection of tools that the new pickers will be using consists of a "pick cart" with upwards of nine bins for placing the products. This setup is accompanied by a number of variable factors to the procedure. While there are approved bins, they exist in a number of styles and not all of the warehouses are required to use the same. We also knew that the placement of the pick cart in relation to the product shelves and the picker is very precise and dependant on specific situations. For instance, employees will need to know when to pull and when to push the cart. This meant that I will need the ability to illustrate the pick cart with a variety of bins and in an infinite number of positions from multiple angles. Single vector illustrations as used for the wrist scanner would be impractical. The best solution was to model the cart and bins and even the warehouse shelving in a 3D program so that I can arrange the objects, adjust camera angles and simply render each view as can be seen from the below example. These two custom content development techniques are very different though will yield the maximum learning effectiveness in the shortest amount of production time. 
|
|
|
|